dmit：sPro vps测评 – 去程 Cloudflare Magic Transit 加持，回程 GIA 抗DDOS云服务器怎么样?云服务器值不值得购买?云服务器好不好?
最近dmit推出全新的 sPro 系列套餐，去程 Cloudflare Magic Transit 加持，回程 GIA，旨在提供高速低延迟网络的同时也为您带来 CF 级别的 DDoS 防御。该套餐全称 PVM.LAX.sPro.CREATOR，配置均可定制。
去程cf加持的线路，抗DDOS 的cn2 gia，还没测评过，这篇文章就来测评一下，看看数据。dmit的机器购买教程可以了解下。
DMIT服务器购买和使用指南 – 这家的VPS价格略高
sPro套餐测试IP
测试IP：45.88.194.36
测速：http://45.88.194.36:9001
1、测评机器
官网：https://www.dmit.io/
8折优惠码：SPRO-20OFF
sPro 系列套餐，去程 Cloudflare Magic Transit 加持，回程 GIA，配置可以自选，这里列出了一个最便宜的。
- PVM.LAX.sPro.CREATOR
- $14.90/月（8折之后$11.92/月）
- 2+ vCPU
- 2+ GB RAM
- 20+ GB SSD Storage
- 1000+ GB Bandwidth @100Mbps+
- 1 IPv4 & 1 IPv6 /64
- 5Tbps+ DDoS Protection Always-On
- 默认100M带宽
- 购买链接
2、配置信息
AMD的cpu，性能强劲，磁盘io分数很高。
---------------------------------------------------------------------- CPU Model : AMD EPYC 7402P 24-Core Processor CPU Cores : 2 CPU Frequency : 2794.748 MHz CPU Cache : 512 KB Total Disk : 20.0 GB (2.5 GB Used) Total Mem : 1829 MB (135 MB Used) Total Swap : 0 MB (0 MB Used) System uptime : 0 days, 11 hour 12 min Load average : 0.00, 0.00, 0.00 OS : CentOS 8.3.2011 Arch : x86_64 (64 Bit) Kernel : 4.18.0-147.8.1.el8_1.x86_64 TCP CC : cubic Virtualization : KVM Organization : AS54574 DMIT Cloud Services Location : Los Angeles / US Region : California ---------------------------------------------------------------------- I/O Speed(1st run) : 890 MB/s I/O Speed(2nd run) : 923 MB/s I/O Speed(3rd run) : 898 MB/s Average I/O speed : 903.7 MB/s
2、其他杂项
IP非原生，应该是广播过去的。能看hbo~~
-> Network Information IPV4 - IP Address: [HK] 45.88.194.* IPV4 - ASN Info: 54574 (DMIT - DMIT Cloud Services, US) IPV4 - Region: China Hong Kong IPV6 - IP Address: [US] 2605:52c0:2:7bf:: IPV6 - ASN Info: 54574 (DMIT - DMIT Cloud Services, US) IPV6 - Region: United States United States -> Media Unlock Test HBO Now: Yes Bahamut Anime: No Abema.TV: No Princess Connect Re:Dive Japan: No BBC: No Bilibili China Mainland Only: No Bilibili Hongkong/Macau/Taiwan: Yes Bilibili Taiwan Only: No -> CPU Performance Test (Fast Mode, 1-Pass @ 5sec) 1 Thread Test: 1610 Scores 2 Threads Test: 3234 Scores -> Memory Performance Test (Fast Mode, 1-Pass @ 5sec) 1 Thread - Read Test : 42071.19 MB/s 1 Thread - Write Test: 18329.03 MB/s -> Disk Speed Test (4K Block/1M Block, Direct Mode) Test Name Write Speed Read Speed 100MB-4K Block 42.8 MB/s (0.10 IOPS, 2.45 s) 52.4 MB/s (12793 IOPS, 2.00 s) 1GB-1M Block 952 MB/s (908 IOPS, 1.10 s) 295 MB/s (281 IOPS, 3.56 s)
3、speed测试
电信和移动不错，联通拉跨！
ID 测速服务器信息 上传/Mbps 下载/Mbps 延迟/ms 3633 电信|上海 ↑ 95.58 ↓ 99.68 130.86 24012 电信|内蒙古呼和浩特 ↑ 83.66 ↓ 99.07 165.84 17145 电信|安徽合肥５Ｇ ↑ 98.02 ↓ 101.34 150.08 27594 电信|广东广州５Ｇ ↑ 47.85 ↓ 72.37 165.95 27575 电信|新疆乌鲁木齐 ↑ 73.16 ↓ 101.77 203.49 5396 电信|江苏苏州５Ｇ ↑ 93.20 ↓ 103.86 133.65 23844 电信|湖北武汉 ↑ 94.73 ↓ 100.77 177.96 29353 电信|湖北武汉５Ｇ ↑ 82.24 ↓ 103.19 173.09 28225 电信|湖南长沙５Ｇ ↑ 2.11 ↓ 73.20 165.84 3973 电信|甘肃兰州 ↑ 88.30 ↓ 100.69 169.69 24447 联通|上海５Ｇ ↑ 1.45 ↓ 105.55 325.33 5145 联通|北京 ↑ 0.80 ↓ 41.32 324.42 2461 联通|四川成都 ↑ 2.31 ↓ 39.75 353.62 27154 联通|天津５Ｇ ↑ 1.40 ↓ 33.96 262.70 26180 联通|山东济南５Ｇ ↑ 2.14 ↓ 51.67 249.76 26678 联通|广东广州５Ｇ ↑ 1.21 ↓ 22.99 231.83 13704 联通|江苏南京 ↑ 1.98 ↓ 30.52 232.31 5485 联通|湖北武汉 ↑ 4.84 ↓ 53.79 234.34 4870 联通|湖南长沙 ↑ 0.78 ↓ 51.08 249.46 4863 联通|陕西西安 ↑ 0.90 ↓ 42.23 241.97 30232 移动|内蒙呼和浩特５Ｇ↑ 97.06 ↓ 98.02 179.22 25858 移动|北京 ↑ 95.47 ↓ 103.70 173.32 17184 移动|天津５Ｇ ↑ 99.45 ↓ 103.41 178.22 26938 移动|新疆乌鲁木齐５Ｇ↑ 96.76 ↓ 102.36 209.92 16171 移动|福建福州 ↑ 93.04 ↓ 103.48 190.03 16398 移动|贵州贵阳 ↑ 88.86 ↓ 105.75 202.80
4、路由测试
电信去程
去程确实是走了163，然后走了cf的线路！
电信回程
回程cn2 gia无疑！！
Traceroute to China, Shanghai CT (TCP Mode, Max 30 Hop) ============================================================ traceroute to 180.153.28.5 (180.153.28.5), 30 hops max, 60 byte packets 1 154.17.0.1 5.96 ms AS174,AS54574 United States California Los Angeles cogentco.com 2 193.41.248.225 0.40 ms AS54574 United States California Los Angeles dmit.io 3 193.41.248.130 0.79 ms AS54574 United States California Los Angeles dmit.io 4 59.43.181.145 125.93 ms * China Shanghai ChinaTelecom 5 * 6 59.43.130.217 129.89 ms * China Shanghai ChinaTelecom 7 59.43.80.82 131.40 ms * China Shanghai ChinaTelecom 8 61.152.24.5 135.07 ms AS4812 China Shanghai ChinaTelecom 9 * 10 124.74.232.54 133.85 ms AS4811 China Shanghai ChinaTelecom 11 101.227.255.34 132.37 ms AS4812 China Shanghai ChinaTelecom 12 180.153.28.5 129.08 ms AS4812 China Shanghai ChinaTelecom Traceroute to China, Beijing CT (TCP Mode, Max 30 Hop) ============================================================ traceroute to 180.149.128.9 (180.149.128.9), 30 hops max, 60 byte packets 1 154.17.0.1 7.21 ms AS174,AS54574 United States California Los Angeles cogentco.com 2 193.41.248.225 0.30 ms AS54574 United States California Los Angeles dmit.io 3 193.41.248.130 0.94 ms AS54574 United States California Los Angeles dmit.io 4 59.43.184.157 125.95 ms * China Shanghai ChinaTelecom 5 59.43.182.233 170.48 ms * China Beijing ChinaTelecom 6 * 7 59.43.132.9 156.57 ms * China Beijing ChinaTelecom 8 * 9 36.110.244.46 173.32 ms AS23724 China Beijing ChinaTelecom 10 36.110.246.198 156.78 ms AS23724 China Beijing ChinaTelecom 11 * 12 180.149.128.9 154.18 ms AS23724 China Beijing ChinaTelecom
移动去程
去程也走了cf的线路
移动回程
移动回程走了cn2 gia
Traceroute to China, Beijing CM (TCP Mode, Max 30 Hop) ============================================================ traceroute to 211.136.25.153 (211.136.25.153), 30 hops max, 60 byte packets 1 154.17.0.1 13.45 ms AS174,AS54574 United States California Los Angeles cogentco.com 2 193.41.248.225 0.36 ms AS54574 United States California Los Angeles dmit.io 3 193.41.248.130 0.75 ms AS54574 United States California Los Angeles dmit.io 4 59.43.181.145 125.92 ms * China Shanghai ChinaTelecom 5 * 6 59.43.130.213 132.33 ms * China Shanghai ChinaTelecom 7 59.43.80.14 137.23 ms * China Shanghai ChinaTelecom 8 * 9 * 10 * 11 221.183.9.197 239.95 ms AS9808 China Beijing ChinaMobile 12 111.24.2.241 173.01 ms AS9808 China Beijing ChinaMobile 13 111.24.2.134 171.96 ms AS9808 China Beijing ChinaMobile 14 211.136.67.106 174.86 ms AS56048 China Beijing ChinaMobile 15 211.136.63.66 174.36 ms AS56048 China Beijing ChinaMobile 16 211.136.95.226 172.83 ms AS56048 China Beijing ChinaMobile 17 * 18 * 19 211.136.25.153 172.91 ms AS56048 China Beijing ChinaMobile
联通去程
联通也是走了cf对线路
联通回程
联通回程也是走了cn2 gia
Traceroute to China, Shanghai CU (TCP Mode, Max 30 Hop) ============================================================ traceroute to 58.247.8.158 (58.247.8.158), 30 hops max, 60 byte packets 1 154.17.0.1 12.13 ms AS174,AS54574 United States California Los Angeles cogentco.com 2 193.41.248.225 0.41 ms AS54574 United States California Los Angeles dmit.io 3 193.41.248.130 0.57 ms AS54574 United States California Los Angeles dmit.io 4 59.43.189.37 126.69 ms * China Shanghai ChinaTelecom 5 59.43.187.69 129.01 ms * China Shanghai ChinaTelecom 6 59.43.130.213 130.16 ms * China Shanghai ChinaTelecom 7 * 8 219.158.9.97 164.20 ms AS4837 China Shanghai ChinaUnicom 9 * 10 58.247.221.178 157.70 ms AS17621 China Shanghai ChinaUnicom 11 139.226.225.22 158.39 ms AS17621 China Shanghai ChinaUnicom 12 58.247.8.153 166.70 ms AS17621 China Shanghai ChinaUnicom
5、路由掉包
晚高峰23:00测试
7、全国ping
ping值很不错啊~
8、unixbench跑分
单核跑分1684.4，可以看出amd的u很强悍！
Benchmark Run: Sat Dec 26 2021 02:37:17 - 03:05:05
2 CPUs in system; running 1 parallel copy of tests
Dhrystone 2 using register variables 40337382.1 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Double-Precision Whetstone 7504.9 MWIPS (8.9 s, 7 samples)
Execl Throughput 5467.7 lps (29.9 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 1092587.0 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 299266.8 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 2848303.6 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
Pipe Throughput 1718871.7 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Pipe-based Context Switching 222923.8 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Process Creation 12354.5 lps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 8853.1 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples)
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 1393.0 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples)
System Call Overhead 1454974.8 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
System Benchmarks Index Values BASELINE RESULT INDEX
Dhrystone 2 using register variables 116700.0 40337382.1 3456.5
Double-Precision Whetstone 55.0 7504.9 1364.5
Execl Throughput 43.0 5467.7 1271.6
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 3960.0 1092587.0 2759.1
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 1655.0 299266.8 1808.3
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 5800.0 2848303.6 4910.9
Pipe Throughput 12440.0 1718871.7 1381.7
Pipe-based Context Switching 4000.0 222923.8 557.3
Process Creation 126.0 12354.5 980.5
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 42.4 8853.1 2088.0
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 6.0 1393.0 2321.6
System Call Overhead 15000.0 1454974.8 970.0
========
System Benchmarks Index Score 1684.4
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Benchmark Run: Sat Dec 26 2021 03:05:05 - 03:32:55
2 CPUs in system; running 2 parallel copies of tests
Dhrystone 2 using register variables 80842035.6 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Double-Precision Whetstone 14976.0 MWIPS (8.9 s, 7 samples)
Execl Throughput 7970.6 lps (29.6 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 752390.7 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 214249.0 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 2472099.7 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
Pipe Throughput 3415388.3 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Pipe-based Context Switching 444247.6 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Process Creation 20463.4 lps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 10880.3 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples)
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 1462.4 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples)
System Call Overhead 2209897.5 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
System Benchmarks Index Values BASELINE RESULT INDEX
Dhrystone 2 using register variables 116700.0 80842035.6 6927.3
Double-Precision Whetstone 55.0 14976.0 2722.9
Execl Throughput 43.0 7970.6 1853.6
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 3960.0 752390.7 1900.0
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 1655.0 214249.0 1294.6
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 5800.0 2472099.7 4262.2
Pipe Throughput 12440.0 3415388.3 2745.5
Pipe-based Context Switching 4000.0 444247.6 1110.6
Process Creation 126.0 20463.4 1624.1
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 42.4 10880.3 2566.1
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 6.0 1462.4 2437.3
System Call Overhead 15000.0 2209897.5 1473.3
========
System Benchmarks Index Score 2248.8
9、江苏电信本地上传下载
电信上传和下载都能跑满~
上传：
下载：
10、最后
总结线路：去程走的是163 Cloudflare，三网回程 CN2GIA，抗ddos，线路非常不错。如果你在找一款抗ddos，又走的cn2 gia线路的机器，那么dmit的这款很符合你的要求。
缺点，价格贵，最便宜的打完8折，都要11刀。不过非常适合用来建站！！至于联通的拉跨可能因为Cloudflare没有联通直连的原因~~
至于主打的5Tbps+ DDoS Protection，cloudflare抗国外应该有5T, 但抗国内量只有不到100G！！！
- 1、测评机器
- 2、配置信息
- 2、其他杂项
- 3、speed测试
- 4、路由测试
- 5、路由掉包
- 7、全国ping
- 8、unixbench跑分
- 9、江苏电信本地上传下载
- 10、最后
来源链接：https://www.vpssz.com/
本站声明:网站内容来源于网络,如有侵权,请联系我们,我们将及时处理。
郑重声明:VPS主机评测仅提供资料收集及VPS云主机信息推介，不提供任何VPS云主机及代购业务！
